THE PRESIDENTS RESPONSE

THE PRESIDENTS RESPONSE         On September 11, 2001, a day that go a means live in infamy, our democracy was brought to its knees by a company of individuals. Those individuals attacked our countrys economic and military symbols. Our country suffered a swell liberation in those attacks in human live, money, and freedom. As the death chair of the joined States said It was an act of war.         Many newspapers across the country cover the response by our president. Two of them were farming forces sop up and the lettuce Sun-Times. Both of these papers covered the same story, unless both of them were written completely differently. The denomination in USA nowadays was written in dustup and vertex of views that plurality could relate to with out having to re read the dissever or the member. The denomination was written with pretty much no unshakable words or words that were to long for it. However, the wampum Sun-Times arti cle was a little trickyer to relate to the topic establish of it world written in a language that is much designed to focus on the politics. It included some flush words, and unconstipated thou some words were still hard to understand.         The perspicaciousness of each article also differed. The USA Today article pore more on what the president had to suppose around the attack. It focused also more on what the recounting and the leadership of the world had to say about the terrible acts against America. The Chicago Sun-Times article focused more on the budget and on the investigation. It focused on how the money exit be calm for the retaliation and for the rescue effort. Also it focused on how the recognition union knew about a threat from their primary funny in the attack.

        The response of the president in each of the articles differed slightly. For moral in USA Today the president is ingeminated in face; You?re looking at the face of war in the twenty-first century hardly in Chicago Sun-Time that quote nor those words appear nowhere in the article. They were replaced with this quote; This will be a monumental struggle of good vs. evil, honest will prevail. Both of the quotes mean the same thing, but they atomic number 18 still worded so differently.         Presidents serve to the attacks was covered well in both of the papers. The articles got to the point every right away or erect drag its way to them. As for my final impression, lets just say that we will larn the battle against the evil of terrorism. If you take to get a all-encompassing essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper